Showing posts with label Gender Identity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender Identity. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 April 2026

Acts 15: The Most Misunderstood Chapter in the Bible

Acts 15 is one of those chapters everyone thinks they understand — until they actually read it in context. For many Christians, the Jerusalem Council is the moment the apostles “freed” Gentile believers from the Torah. But when you look at the chapter through first‑century Jewish eyes, and when you listen to what a wide range of respected scholars say, a very different picture emerges.

Acts 15 isn’t about lowering the bar.
It’s about opening the door.

The apostles weren’t trying to exempt Gentiles from God’s ways. They were trying to keep them in the synagogue, where they could hear Moses taught every Sabbath and learn how to walk in God’s ways over time.

This reading isn’t fringe. It’s supported by scholars across the spectrum: F. F. Bruce (The Book of the Acts), James D. G. Dunn (Beginning From Jerusalem), Richard Bauckham (James: Wisdom of James), Ben Witherington III (The Acts of the Apostles), Craig Keener (Acts: An Exegetical Commentary), C. K. Barrett (ICC Acts), Jacob Jervell (Luke and the People of God), Mark Nanos (The Irony of Galatians), Paula Fredriksen (Paul: The Pagans’ Apostle), and David Rudolph (A Jew to the Jews). They don’t agree on everything, but on Acts 15 they converge in striking ways.

What the Apostles Were Actually Trying to Solve

The debate in Acts 15 wasn’t about whether Gentiles could be saved. Peter had already settled that in Acts 10–11.

The real issue was this:
How can Gentile believers join the people of God without undergoing ethnic conversion to Judaism?

Some Pharisee‑believers insisted that Gentiles must be circumcised and take on full halakhic obligations (Acts 15:1, 5). The apostles rejected that — not because Torah was irrelevant, but because ethnic conversion was not required for covenant membership.

This distinction between identity and obedience is the key to the whole chapter.

Why the Four Prohibitions Were a Minimum, Not a New Law

James gives Gentile believers four immediate prohibitions: avoid idolatry, sexual immorality, strangled meat, and blood (Acts 15:20).

A remarkable number of major scholars agree that these were the minimum requirements for Gentiles to participate in synagogue fellowship. They come straight from Leviticus 17–18, the section that outlines what resident aliens (gerim) must avoid if they want to live among Israel.

These weren’t the only things Gentile believers were expected to obey. They were the things Gentiles needed to avoid so they wouldn’t be barred from the synagogue before they’d even begun learning.

And James tells you this plainly:

“For Moses has been preached in every city from ancient times and is read in the synagogues every Sabbath.”
— Acts 15:21

This is the line almost everyone skips.
But Bruce, Dunn, Bauckham, Witherington, Keener, Barrett, and others all highlight it as the key to the entire chapter.

James’ logic is simple:
Let the Gentiles in.
Let them hear Moses.
Let them grow.

The four prohibitions were the doorway, not the destination.

Why Early Believers Called Themselves “The Way”

Before anyone used the word “Christian,” the early believers called their movement “The Way” (Acts 9:2; 19:9, 23; 24:14, 22).

This is halakhic language. Halakhah literally means “the way of walking.”

To follow Jesus was to walk in God’s ways — the very thing Gentiles would learn by hearing Moses every Sabbath.

The apostles weren’t abandoning Torah.
They were teaching Gentiles how to walk in it through the Messiah.

Why Gentiles Kept Being Called “Gentiles”

Modern readers often assume that “Gentile” means “outside the people of God.” But in Scripture, ethnic labels often persist even after covenantal belonging changes.

Ruth is the classic example.

She pledges herself to Naomi — “Your people shall be my people, and your God my God” (Ruth 1:16) — and she’s fully welcomed into Israel. She becomes the great‑grandmother of David and appears in Jesus’ genealogy (Matthew 1:5). Yet Scripture still calls her “Ruth the Moabite” long after she has joined the people of God.

Ethnicity persists.
Covenant status changes.

Paula Fredriksen puts it well: early Gentile believers were “ex‑pagans,” not “ex‑Gentiles.” Their background didn’t vanish, but their allegiance did.

But Scripture also teaches something deeper: belonging to God’s people has never been about genetics. Abraham himself was not ethnically “Jewish” — he was a Mesopotamian who became the father of Israel by faith (Genesis 15:6). Biblically, faith creates covenant identity. So when Gentiles come to Israel’s God through the Messiah, they join the people of God in the same way Abraham did: by faith. In that sense, they become part of Israel — “Jews” not by flesh, but by faith.

And the Torah makes clear that this distinction is not meant to last across generations. 

Numbers 15 insists that there is “one Torah for the native‑born and for the stranger,” which means that once a Gentile joins Israel, their children grow up inside the covenant community and become indistinguishable from those with a Jewish heritage. 

The “Gentile” label applies only to the first generation, and only for operational reasons — because they must be taught the Torah from the beginning. 

This is exactly what Acts 15 is doing: giving first‑generation Gentile believers a starting point so they can remain in the synagogue, hear Moses every Sabbath, and raise the next generation fully inside God’s people.

So when the New Testament keeps calling Gentile believers “Gentiles,” it isn’t excluding them. It’s simply acknowledging their origin — just as it does with Ruth.

One People, One Spirit, One Torah

Paul insists that there is one body (Ephesians 4:4), not two. And the Torah itself insists that there is one Torah for both native‑born Israelites and those who join them (Numbers 15:15–16).

Scholars like Jervell, Keener, and Rudolph point out that Luke sees the early church not as a new religion but as the continuation of Israel — expanded, renewed, and opened to the nations.

Acts 15 fits perfectly into that vision.

It’s not a rejection of Torah.
It’s a rejection of ethnic gatekeeping.

The apostles weren’t lowering the standard for Gentiles. They were giving them a starting point — a way in — so they could learn the rest as they grew.

The Real Message of Acts 15

Once you read Acts 15 in context, the chapter becomes beautifully clear:

  • Gentiles don’t need to become ethnic Jews to join God’s people.
  • But by faith, they join Israel the same way Abraham and Ruth did.
  • They must avoid certain practices so they can remain welcome in the synagogue.
  • The synagogue is where they will hear Moses every Sabbath.
  • Over time, they will learn how to walk in God’s ways.
  • There is one people of God, not two.
  • There is one Torah, not two.
  • Ethnic labels persist for one generation, but covenant status is shared.

Acts 15 is the apostles’ elegant solution to a real pastoral problem:

How do you integrate people who know nothing of God’s commandments into a community shaped by them?

Their answer was simple:

Give them a starting point.
Keep them in the synagogue.
Let them hear Moses.
Let them grow.

Far from abolishing the Torah, Acts 15 opens the door for Gentiles to learn it — and to become, like Abraham, full members of God’s people by faith.

Saturday, 7 January 2023

Raising a 17-year-old daughter in Pornland


My daughter turned 17 last week.

Two or three years ago I went on a long walk with my then 15-year-old son and we talked about romantic relationships and what a healthy relationship looks like.

I'm also on the board of a Christian school and we have had to deal with lots of issues related to sexual relationships:

  1. Gender identity
  2. Promiscuity
  3. Homosexuality
  4. Sexualisation of anything and everything (well it feels like that)
And this experience has made me much more concerned about the risk that my children will become influenced by the wider culture and accept its dysfunctional norms.

Together, I was conscious that I hadn't had the same talk with my 17-year-old daughter.

Mama Bear


And in that book, it refers to an eye-opening article from 2016 called "Growing up in Pornland".  That was seven years ago but there's nothing to suggest that the trends and behaviours mentioned in that article have lost their momentum.  If they have, then it's probably because the adoption of those behaviours has reached saturation levels.  

But nonetheless, the level of dysfunction on human relationships is considerable.  Perhaps its nothing new, perhaps its been like that for centuries but now the Internet has made it widespread and its the fact that Judeo-Christianity has made it unacceptable.  After all other societies have objectified woman for thousands of years.

Its only in relatively recent history that woman have been considered anything more than "chattels."  That is objects of personal property for men.

Still, I'd like to think that the biblical norm is the one we'd aspire to rather than regress back to the "good old days"!

Some notable quotes from Mama Bear:

"...what if these chemicals [e.g. dopamine] are released while watching porn?  Yes, the human brain becomes wired to actually crave a two-dimensional image over the real thing -- over a real person.  We literally bond to a screen.  This is actually one of the reasons porn usage decreases a person's likelihood to engage in real-life sex."

"So when we hear people complain about how sleeping with one person for the rest of their life sounds boring, what they're really lamenting is the damage they have created in their own brain that's preventing them from being comforted by the breast of the love of their youth (Proverbs 5:18-19)."

"What happens when you flood your brain regularly with too much dopamine?  Your body says, "Oh!  I guess we don't need all these dopamine receptors.  Let's get rid of a few.""

"...regularly viewing porn decreases the dopamine receptors in a person's brain -- which means, like in all addictions, that the person has to increase their consumption in order to get the same amount of euphoria."

Some notable quotes from Growing up in Pornland:

"Asked, “How do you know a guy likes you?” a eighth grader replied: “He still wants to talk to you after you suck him off.” A male high school student said to a girl: “If you suck my dick I’ll give you a kiss.” Girls are expected to provide sex acts for tokens of affection. A 15-year-old told me she didn’t enjoy sex at all, but that getting it out of the way quickly was the only way her boyfriend would settle down and watch a movie with her."

"I meet girls who describe being groped in the school yard, girls routinely sexually harassed at school or on the school bus on the way home. They tell me boys act like they are entitled to girls’ bodies. Defenders of porn often say that it provides sex education. And it does: it teaches even very young boys that women and girls are always up for it. “No” in fact means “yes,” or “persuade me.”"

"Will I ever find the ONE"

Instead of progress, pornography is taking us back.  Back to a time when woman are objects, pieces of property, instruments of gratification.

I said to my 17-year old daughter, a real, healthy relationship is one where there is not just a physical attraction but also a meeting of minds and hearts.  Your physical attributes will age over time.  Then what's left?  A life-long relationship with your husband ultimately rests on his respect for your heart and mind.  

Delayed gratification brings long term rewards, because it will show whether he has the maturity to engage with your heart and mind.  If not, you must show enough strength of character and self-respect to step back, and no matter how much you got your hopes up that he is the ONE, there is a better person out there.

At our church, there was a delightful presentation given by another 17-year old girl and she mentioned that she often wondered "whether she will ever find her life partner."

I laughed:  With over 7 billion people in the world and over 2.2 billion of them Christians, I don't think any 17-year-old should have a problem finding someone.  The real problem is:  How to choose wisely.

Get stuck in

Instead, I said to my daughter, 
  • get stuck into what God has given you to do, 
  • get involved in your youth group, 
  • plan mission trips, 
  • organize soup kitchens for the poor, 
  • join bible studies, 
  • join Christian groups on campus, 
  • build a Christian business or career.  
As you get stuck in, you will meet other Christans of like mind and the rest will naturally follow.

In the meantime, use the time wisely to think through stuff like, how would you like to raise children, where would you like to live, what is God's calling on your life (at least for now)?

Nothing is more attractive than someone who looks like they have got their life together and they know where they're headed.

Here's hoping the answer to the last one, that is, "what they want", is that whatever they end up doing, they bring glory to God and inspires people to want to follow Him too.